The move deepened a mystery encompassing the pernicious spread of a deadly pathogen, an intricate epidemiological puzzle, the opacity of a totalitarian system and the bitter overtones of a superpower rivalry. It will fan doubts about the World Health Organization’s capacity to tease out lessons from the current crisis in order to prevent future pandemics.
In the US, it leaves both the former Trump administration and the Biden White House facing calls for transparency about their efforts to establish how the virus started and whether politics tainted their investigative efforts. If it turns out the virus did escape from a laboratory, former President Donald Trump may be able to claim some vindication. But it would also highlight how his repeated habit of trashing the truth and bending intelligence to suit his own political ends shattered his credibility on this and other issues.
The focus on the laboratory theory in recent days multiplied calls in Washington for the US to make China pay a price for the pandemic, even before the full extent of its origins are known, adding more toxicity to a geopolitical joust that may spark a new Cold War.
Facing his own political pressure, Biden laid out two theories seen as “likely” by US intelligence on the origin of the virus in a statement on Wednesday.
The first has long been regarded as the most credible possibility by public health experts — that there was zoonotic spread, possibly from live animals in a “wet” market in the Chinese city of Wuhan, to humans.
But while cautioning there was no definitive conclusion yet, the President said that “one element” of the US intelligence community “leans” toward the possibility that the virus escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan.
The Biden administration is now facing calls to show it took the possibility of Chinese culpability sufficiently seriously especially since prominent Trump team officials and Republicans are launching a victory lap after last year promoting claims about the Wuhan lab — mostly without any clear evidence.
But Trump supporters also appear to be making another attempt to whitewash history of his disastrous handling of a pandemic that killed hundreds of thousands on his watch.
‘No cherry picking’
The medical and political priority now is a credible, in-depth, investigation.
Dr. Leana Wen, a CNN medical analyst and former Baltimore Health Commissioner, said on CNN “Newsroom” that such a probe needed to be based on a scientific method, “which means you don’t go into this with a preferred conclusion and then cherry pick your data to fit that conclusion.”
Such concerns are why the Biden administration closed down the probe opened by ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, two sources told CNN’s Kylie Atwood.
The Trump administration, facing election-year blame for its botched handling of a pandemic the ex-President long downplayed, had a strong incentive to find Chinese negligence, whatever the real story was. It also had a record of shaping science and intelligence for political ends and rejecting inconvenient expertise.
It now falls to the Biden administration to prove that it has the clout and willingness to track down the origin of the virus. There will be questions whether intelligence agencies, given the notorious difficulty of penetrating the Chinese security state, represent the best way of finding the truth. It is not yet clear whether China fully understands the origin of the virus. And the starting points of pandemics can be difficult to pinpoint.
“Many of us feel that it is more likely that this is a natural occurrence … where it goes from an animal reservoir to a human. But we don’t know 100% the answer to that,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, the government’s top infectious diseases expert, said at a White House Covid-19 briefing Tuesday.
But the Biden White House does have some political exposure on the issue. Last year, Democrats rebuked Trump for pulling out of the WHO on the grounds that it was dominated by China. The US rejoined the global body soon after the new President took office. If it turns out Beijing hoodwinked the WHO, which downplayed the laboratory theory, senior Trump officials can claim some vindication.
White House hardens line
In recent days, there has been a noticeable hardening of the US line toward the WHO and Beijing, and the White House has been covering its tracks.
Andy Slavitt, the White House’s Covid-19 coordinator, said on Tuesday that the US needed a “completely transparent process from China. We need the WHO to assist in that matter. We don’t feel like we have that now.”
His comments raised the question of whether the WHO, in its current configuration, has the diplomatic weight and capacity to conduct an investigation that China is likely to obstruct.
“The World Health Organization is not capable of undertaking this investigation because, frankly, the Chinese won’t allow it,” Republican Sen. Marco Rubio argued on Fox News on Wednesday. The Florida senator is one of a number of Republicans who may run for President in 2024, and taking a hard line on China will be part of the price for entry into the primary race.
A victory lap
Trump administration veterans and supporters responded to the latest events by claiming they were right to fling accusations at China despite not yet having offered public evidence.
“We need to know what happened here. The Chinese Communist Party knows what happened here. They know who patient zero was. They know precisely where this began,” Pompeo said on Fox News on Monday.
Pompeo is asking reasonable questions, even if he has political motives. The Chinese government was tardy in warning the rest of the world of the tragedy that was unfolding in Wuhan.|
And the WHO appears to have struggled to secure timely and detailed answers about what was going on in late 2019 and early 2020 as the virus erupted.
Indiana Republican Sen. Todd Young told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Wednesday that the global health body needed to act fast to reestablish its reputation by persuading China to come up with more data about the origins of the virus.
“I don’t see any other way for the World Health Organization to restore its credibility in the eyes of Americans and many across the world, who have seen them, frankly, place more trust in the Chinese Communist Party leadership and more deference to them than they have to the Western world,” Young said.
Trump himself gave the impression back in May 2020 that he had some information about the origin of the virus, saying, “Something happened.” “It came came from China. It should have been stopped. It could have been stopped on the spot,” Trump said.
The ex-President, however, frequently touted conspiracy theories, hunches and manipulated intelligence and facts to serve his own political argument. He also politicized the virus for his own ends. So, he was not seen as a particularly credible source. And the question remains — if the Trump team had evidence of the lab theory, why did they not tell the world when they had every incentive to do so?
Claims that Trump was “right” about Covid-19 also distract from his own culpability in mismanaging a virus that he repeatedly said was not a problem.
Whatever Covid-19’s origin, history will condemn Trump for his neglect and denial once it reached US soil. He actually hampered US preparedness early in the crisis because he failed to pressure Beijing for answers.
As he sought a China trade deal to burnish his reelection campaign, he fawned over China’s President. Trump said in early 2020 that the Chinese were “working very hard” and doing “very well.” Of Xi, Trump tweeted, “He is strong, sharp and powerfully focused on leading the counterattack on the Coronavirus.”
It was only when the impact of the virus became clear on his own election prospects that he changed his tune, bolstering the idea he has a political motivation in blaming China for pandemic.